Klaus Mager
Key Insight: Incentivizing Regenerative Agriculture
Klaus focused on transitioning from climate warnings to actionable solutions through economic incentives for farmers.
Main Context
Frustration: Received yet another "last urgent warning" from Union of Concerned Scientists (via Oregon State or Portland State)
Problem:
- These warnings have been coming for 3-4 years
- People either already know or dismiss them
- "What is really missing here is a transition to what can you actually do about this"
Food with Thought Initiative
Partnership: Working with Schumacher Institute in the UK
Two Work Streams:
-
Getting Food Hubs into Wholesale Markets
- Target: Small-to-medium farmers ("agriculture of the middle")
- These farmers currently can't access markets
- CSAs + farmers markets = only ~3% of total food sales
- Goal: Help farmers bundle/aggregate to participate in wholesale markets
-
Paying Farmers for Environmental Services
- Creating a secondary revenue stream
- Farmers grow TWO crops:
- Food crop (primary revenue)
- Environmental benefit crop (new revenue stream)
The Core Concept
Why Agriculture?
- "Probably the most damaging part of our interaction with the natural world"
- Destroys watersheds, soils, biodiversity
- BUT: "Has the capacity to turn that... to recover and heal, and to regenerate"
The Problem with Big Ag:
- Monsanto, Nestle, etc. working on automation
- "Smart technology" and "climate-smart technology"
- Hugely capital-intensive
- Excludes more farmers who can't afford investment
The Alternative:
- "You can absolutely shift into regenerative practices at scale"
- IF farmers are incentivized and paid for it
How It Works
Measurement & Incentives:
- Track what farmers promise to do
- Monitor outputs
- Create contracts for environmental services
Example: Mississippi Delta:
- Groups of farmers paid to reduce nitrogen runoff into Mississippi River
- Easy to measure
- Incentives sufficient to motivate conservative farmers
- "There's just so much money at stake that they are going to do it"
Cascade Effect:
- To reduce nitrogen runoff, farmers must find other fertilization methods
- Leads to improved soil health
- Which requires cover crops
- Possibly no-till farming
- Crop rotation
- Possibly perennials
- "All these other things fall into place"
Single-Point Measurements:
- One measurement (like nitrogen runoff) can shift the entire system
- Creates positive feedback loops
Equipment Challenge
Problem: A farmer wanting to use cover crops needs different equipment - which is expensive.
Question: "How is a small to medium-sized farmer going to shift into environmental farming without having the support structure for it?"
Systemic View
Scale: "In every industry, there are ways where we could insert ourselves and provide the incentives at scale"
Target: "Mostly NGOs, non-profit, small and medium-sized farms"
Resistance: "How stubbornly resistant the market is to engage in change"
Chat Contributions
Shared resources on Gates Foundation agriculture strategy:
- https://usrtk.org/bill-gates/critiques-of-gates-foundation/
- https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/Documents/agricultural-development-strategy-overview.pdf
Discussed project with Schumacher Institute focused on wholesale markets and ecosystem services.
Related Concepts
- Regenerative Agriculture
- Environmental Services Revenue
- Agriculture of the Middle
- Schumacher Institute
- Food Hubs
Related Chat Discussions
- David Witzel shared Nature article on "dynamics of the economy in regenerative ag": https://www.nature.com/articles/s44264-025-00100-1
- Discussion of Gates Foundation agricultural strategy
Back to README
Pages that link to this page
- Agriculture of the Middle
- Books and Publications
- Chat Thread - Regenerative Agriculture Resources
- Concept Index
- David Witzel
- Environmental Services Revenue
- Food Hubs
- Growth in Living Systems
- Index
- Organizations and Initiatives
- README
- Regenerative Agriculture
- Regenerative Economics
- Schumacher Institute